Written in ENTERTAINMENT the
On January 12, it was announced that Lisa Marie Presley, daughter of Elvis, dies at 54 after suffering two heart attacks and complaining of a stomach ache.
The also singer would have suffered from a cardiac arrest and was declared brain deadin addition to the fact that the family asked not to resuscitate her.
“Lisa Marie Presley’s heart stopped a second time after she was hospitalized, but because of her condition, her family had already ordered doctors not to resuscitate her,” TMZ reported.
The will of Lisa Marie Presley that seeks to invalidate Priscilla
After the death of the famous, it has now come to light that her mother Priscilla Presley is seeking to contest the will by Lisa Marie.
The actress has stated that she is concerned about a “supposed amendment of 2016″ to a trust of his daughter, which made him question the authenticity of the document.
In this, the daughter of the deceased is named, Riley Keoughas the co-trusteein addition to questioning the signature of the star to find out if it is authentic or not.
So the star of “Where’s the Cop?” has filed a series of documents in a Los Angeles court challenging the amendment that ensures Riley and Benjamin, who lost his life in 2020, are co-trustees.
According to the star, both she and barry siegel. Priscilla’s former business manager, they were appointed as co-trustees in 1993.
This would have happened when Marie “executed a revocable living trust, which she completely modified and reformulated on January 27, 2010” and that in 2016 the alleged Wills of the singer’s daughter.
Entertainment Tonight opined that “there are many questions surrounding the authenticity and validity of the alleged 2016 amendment,” as there is a misspelling of Lisa’s name when previously they had been very careful with the details.
It should be noted that before she passed away, Lisa was in full legal battle with Siegel for the management of the fortune, since he has a 15% stake in the assets of Graceland, Elvis’s mansion, as well as the licensing rights of his intellectual property.
Likewise, the 2016 document was not entered into Marie’s life, while the annex to the will was not ratified before the notary.