The Third Collegiate Court in Criminal Matters in Mexico City (CDMX) denied Inés Gómez Mont amparo for the arrest warrant issued against her for the crime of tax fraud.
This ruling means that said arrest warrant is confirmed again, since he is accused of evading the payment of taxes for the fiscal years corresponding to the years 2015 and 2017.
In her last appearance on social networks, Inés Gómez Mont assured in a statement that she had already reached an agreement with the federal authorities regarding the payment of her taxes.
I want to tell you that on November 30, 2018 I entered into a Tax Reparation Agreement with the Attorney General of the Republic FGR and paid 13.5 million pesos (approximately 774 thousand dollars). I don’t understand why they are unaware of that payment.
Although, without mentioning the supposed agreement that Gómez Mont made with the FGR, the magistrates of the Third Collegiate Court unanimously approved the project presented by his colleague Miguel Ángel Medécigo Rodríguez, who denied any protection to the ex-conductor of windowingthese were their conclusions according to The Day.
Although there is a difference in the amount of cumulative income of the complainant in the opinions announced by the Prosecutor’s Office, this is not enough to grant the protection that was taken into consideration the most recent in which the final conclusion of the tax was reached. The tax authorities were not informed. On the other hand, the need for caution was correctly considered proven due to the risk of subtracting justice from the applicant for the amparo.
Until now, there is no data that allows us to assume that the complainant obtained income not declared as salary. For this reason, it is proposed to confirm the sentence and deny the protection of constitutional justice requested in relation to the arrest warrant and its requested execution.
Finally, Gómez Mont has not made any comment on the matter, but, according to the day, the Attorney General of the Republic (FGR) has obtained four arrest warrants against him for the crimes of operations with resources of illicit origin, organized crime and tax fraud. In addition, without an injunction to protect it, such orders may be executed at any time.